![]() ![]() Results (Participants, Descriptives, Outcomes, Subgroups)ĭiscussion (Key findings, Limitations, Interpretations)Ĭonflict of Interest (COI), Author affiliations, Acknowledgments, Funding Methods (Design, Setting, Participants, Variables, Statistics) ![]() Original research manuscripts have the following sections (in chronologic order): The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist is perhaps the most valuable tool in the process of preparing your manuscript for submission. All individuals listed as authors should contribute to the manuscript and overall project in some fashion. In contrast, the last author is often the most senior member of the team, often the principal investigator of the study. The author, who devotes the most effort to the paper, is typically the first and corresponding author. Those involved in the research should discuss who will contribute to the full manuscript (i.e., qualify as an author) and thus the planned order of authorship to reduce complications at the time of manuscript submission. IRB protocols, study design, and data collection and aggregation require a team effort. Although journals and conferences do often publish abstracts, studies with important results should be published in full manuscript form to ensure dissemination and allow attempts at replication. ![]() Many published and presented abstracts do not reach full manuscript publication. Researchers can write an abstract in a short amount of time, though the abstract will evolve as the full manuscript moves to completion. Write a manuscript to interpret and describe your research.Īfter conducting a quality investigation or a study, one should put together an abstract and manuscript to share results. Continuous practice improvement need not be shared with the larger population of treating providers, but dissemination to the entire scientific community allows widespread adoption, criticism, or further testing for replication of findings. Īdditionally, a clinician who integrates a new practice can study effects on patient outcomes, retro- or prospectively. Though beyond the scope of this chapter, instruction for clinicians on how to conduct research and contribute to medical science is provided by many resources. Anyone who treats patients can collect data on outcomes to assess the quality of care delivered (quality improvement is research). Though typically performed by academic doctors or physician-scientists, medical research is open to all clinicians in both informal and formal methods. When gaps exist in the literature, clinicians should consider conducting their own research into these questions. The ability to read a scientific or medical manuscript remains vitally important throughout the career of a clinician. When new clinical queries arise, one should seek answers in the published literature. This is the essence of evidence-based medicine (EBM). A clinician should continuously strive to increase knowledge by reviewing and critiquing papers, thoughtfully considering how to integrate new data into practice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |